<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>P304 - 40 Years EMISA 2019</title>
<link href="http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/33118" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/33118</id>
<updated>2026-07-21T13:35:24Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-07-21T13:35:24Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Qualitative Comparison of Enterprise Architecture Model Maintenance Processes</title>
<link href="http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/33143" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Hacks, Simon</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Lichter, Horst</name>
</author>
<id>http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/33143</id>
<updated>2020-05-14T07:16:18Z</updated>
<published>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Qualitative Comparison of Enterprise Architecture Model Maintenance Processes
Hacks, Simon; Lichter, Horst
Mayr, Heinrich C.; Rinderle-Ma, Stefanie; Strecker, Stefan
Enterprise Architecture (EA) is no end in itself but has to provide central, important, and up-to-date information of the organization to its clients. So far, different researchers have elaborated on processes to ensure a (semi-)automated EA model maintenance. For practitioners this raises the question how the processes can be compared to each other. To answer this question, we identified a set of five quality criteria and asked EA researcher and practitioners to rate those for three processes.
</summary>
<dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Towards a Virtual Reality-based Process Elicitation System</title>
<link href="http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/33142" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Vogel, Jannis</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Thomas, Oliver</name>
</author>
<id>http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/33142</id>
<updated>2020-05-14T07:16:18Z</updated>
<published>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Towards a Virtual Reality-based Process Elicitation System
Vogel, Jannis; Thomas, Oliver
Mayr, Heinrich C.; Rinderle-Ma, Stefanie; Strecker, Stefan
Today’s worldwide operating companies must design their processes globally. Stakeholders within a global process cannot know each circumstance that is spread over several areas. However, digitalization and globalization lead to process redesigns that have to be discussed and reflected in process modelling workshops with various stakeholders that are more likely non-modelling experts. Hence, traditional process elicitation techniques such as interviews or modelling workshops meet new challenges in a globalized and digitalized world. A promising approach to encounter them is the use of virtual reality as a technology-based process elicitation technique. We have performed a systematic literature review and identified 32 articles to existing technology-based process elicitation techniques. Based on the identified literature a taxonomy and specific requirements for the virtual reality-based process elicitation system were derived. Additionally, the paper proposes an architecture for a virtual reality-based process elicitation system that includes today’s virtual reality 360-degree recording- and hardware standards.
</summary>
<dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Business Process Model Patterns: Classification and Repository of Published Work</title>
<link href="http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/33140" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Fellmann, Michael</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Koschmider, Agnes</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Laue, Ralf</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Schoknecht, Andreas</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Vetter, Arthur</name>
</author>
<id>http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/33140</id>
<updated>2020-05-14T07:16:17Z</updated>
<published>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Business Process Model Patterns: Classification and Repository of Published Work
Fellmann, Michael; Koschmider, Agnes; Laue, Ralf; Schoknecht, Andreas; Vetter, Arthur
Mayr, Heinrich C.; Rinderle-Ma, Stefanie; Strecker, Stefan
Patterns have gained widespread interest and acceptance in various domains. Originating from architecture, patterns are nowadays also suggested as solution templates for various problems related to Business Process Management. Due to the abundance of pattern works, getting an overview on available works or searching for specific patterns can be very difficult. What is missing is an instrument for easy exploration and search. To mitigate this problem, we classified published works on pattern and developed a repository for business process model pattern works. The repository is publicly available and enables browsing and filtering of pattern works according to criteria recently developed by analyzing 280 pattern works.
</summary>
<dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Co-evolution in Business Ecosystems: Findings from Literature</title>
<link href="http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/33141" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Riasanow, Tobias</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Flötgen, Rob Jago</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Greineder, Michael</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Möslein, Dominik</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Böhm, Markus</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Krcmar, Helmut</name>
</author>
<id>http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/33141</id>
<updated>2020-05-14T07:16:17Z</updated>
<published>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Co-evolution in Business Ecosystems: Findings from Literature
Riasanow, Tobias; Flötgen, Rob Jago; Greineder, Michael; Möslein, Dominik; Böhm, Markus; Krcmar, Helmut
Mayr, Heinrich C.; Rinderle-Ma, Stefanie; Strecker, Stefan
The innovative use of digital technologies has led to a disruption of well-established business models in many industries. To prevent from being disrupted, organizations must transform. However, studies about digital transformation have primarily focused on intra-organizational dynamics, including processes, structures, and business models. Digital transformation, however, substantially changes inter-organizational behavior, sometimes the entire ecosystem. To examine this phenomenon, we draw on co-evolution theory, which states that changes occur among all interacting organizations, permitting transformations to be driven by both direct interactions and ecosystem feedbacks. Thus, goal of this paper is to provide a structured overview of literature about the co-evolution of ecosystems in management, organizational science, and IS literature. Following the six properties of co-evolution, we develop a framework for the co-evolution in ecosystems, comprising 23 configurations, based on the analysis of 44 articles. Ultimately, we suggest avenues for future research.
</summary>
<dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
