<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>i-com Band 16 (2017) Heft 1</title>
<link href="http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/6120" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/6120</id>
<updated>2026-07-23T12:50:29Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-07-23T12:50:29Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>The Influence of Computer-Related Attributions on System Evaluation in Usability Testing</title>
<link href="http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/6134" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Niels, Adelka</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Janneck, Monique</name>
</author>
<id>http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/6134</id>
<updated>2018-03-20T10:59:46Z</updated>
<published>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Influence of Computer-Related Attributions on System Evaluation in Usability Testing
Niels, Adelka; Janneck, Monique
Ziegler, Jürgen
Computer-related attributions are cognitions related to the causes and effects of user interactions – or, in other words, subjective explanations of users of why specific system reactions occur. Prior research has revealed different attribution styles, which influence how users interact with computers and how they perceive situations of failure and success. In this paper, we report on a study investigating how computer-related attributions influence users’ perceptions and evaluations of interactive systems. To that end, we conducted usability tests with  users and measured both system evaluations and attributions. Results show correlations between attributions and usability as well as user experience measures, indicating that users’ attributions do influence their evaluations of the test systems. Furthermore, gender differences were revealed. Practical and research implications are described.
</summary>
<dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Editorial</title>
<link href="http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/6136" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Ziegler, Jürgen</name>
</author>
<id>http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/6136</id>
<updated>2018-03-20T10:59:46Z</updated>
<published>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Editorial
Ziegler, Jürgen
Ziegler, Jürgen
</summary>
<dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Impact of SearchTrails on the Quality of Collaborative Search</title>
<link href="http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/6135" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Franken, Sebastian</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Norbisrath, Ulrich</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Prinz, Wolfgang</name>
</author>
<id>http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/6135</id>
<updated>2018-03-20T10:59:46Z</updated>
<published>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Impact of SearchTrails on the Quality of Collaborative Search
Franken, Sebastian; Norbisrath, Ulrich; Prinz, Wolfgang
Ziegler, Jürgen
Several collaborative search systems build upon real-time collaboration during search processes. With the software SearchTrails, we present a novel way of capturing and exchanging the search process between collaborators. We achieve this by asynchronously exchanging the newly developed search trails between collaborators and thus overcome the necessity of real-time interaction for search support. In a study with 29 participants, we evaluate the value of search trails as collaboration artifacts to answer the research question whether search trails improve the quality of collaborative search results. We confirm this and show that users can build upon work of co-searchers in a very efficient way by analyzing and extending the given search trails.
</summary>
<dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Robot Personality Insights. Designing Suitable Robot Personalities for Different Domains</title>
<link href="http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/6130" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Ullrich, Daniel</name>
</author>
<id>http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/6130</id>
<updated>2018-03-20T10:59:46Z</updated>
<published>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Robot Personality Insights. Designing Suitable Robot Personalities for Different Domains
Ullrich, Daniel
Ziegler, Jürgen
With the development of social robots that are primarily designed for interacting with humans, particular facets of interaction need to be explored. One of them is the manifestation of robot personalities, which have the potential to raise acceptance and enhance user experience if done appropriate – or ruin both if done wrong.The present paper argues for the relevance of suitable robot personalities and discusses the factors that affect suitability, in particular interaction domain and personal preferences.An experiment () with four different interaction scenarios (goal- and experience oriented) and three robot personalities (positive, neutral, negative) was performed to explore effects of personality and domain on personality suitability and acceptance. Results indicate that users can differentiate between different robot personalities and evaluate accordingly. In a goal-oriented stressful situation (train-ticket purchase under time pressure) the neutral personality was rated best. In experience-oriented scenarios, the positive robot personality was preferred. In the context of strictly performance oriented tasks, the effect of robot personality seems to be insignificant. Personal preferences for personalities seem to be influential, however, no clear pattern could be found.Lastly, directions for future research are depicted and implications for researchers and designers are discussed.
</summary>
<dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
