Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor.authorJohannsen, Florian
dc.contributor.authorLeist, Susanne
dc.contributor.editorSinz, Elmar J.
dc.contributor.editorSchürr, Andy
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-14T09:41:28Z
dc.date.available2018-11-14T09:41:28Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-88579-295-6
dc.identifier.issn1617-5468
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/18146
dc.description.abstractThe benefits of decomposing process models are widely recognized in literature. Nevertheless, the question of what actually constitutes a “good” decomposition of a business process model has not yet been dealt with in detail. Our starting point for obtaining a “good” decomposition is Wand and Weber's decomposition model for information systems which is specified for business process modeling. In the investigation at hand, we aim to explore in how far modeling languages support the user in fulfilling the decomposition conditions according to Wand and Weber. An important result of the investigation is that all investigated business process modeling languages (BPMN, eEPC, UML AD) can meet most of the requirements.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGesellschaft für Informatik e.V.
dc.relation.ispartofModellierung 2012
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLecture Notes in Informatics (LNI) - Proceedings, Volume P-201
dc.titleReflecting modeling languages regarding Wand and Weber's decomposition modelen
dc.typeText/Conference Paper
dc.pubPlaceBonn
mci.reference.pages27-42
mci.conference.sessiontitleRegular Research Papers
mci.conference.locationBamberg
mci.conference.date14.-16. März 2012


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Zur Kurzanzeige