Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor.authorSchalles, Christian
dc.contributor.authorCreagh, John
dc.contributor.authorRebstock, Michael
dc.contributor.editorSinz, Elmar J.
dc.contributor.editorSchürr, Andy
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-14T09:41:29Z
dc.date.available2018-11-14T09:41:29Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-88579-295-6
dc.identifier.issn1617-5468
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/18150
dc.description.abstractDocumenting, specifying and analyzing complex domains such as information systems or business processes have become unimaginable without the support of graphical models. Generally, models are developed using graph-oriented languages such as Event Driven Process Chains (EPCs) or diagrams of the Unified Modeling Language (UML). For industrial use, modeling languages aim to describe either information systems or business processes. Heterogeneous modeling languages allow different grades of usability to their users. In our paper we focus on an evaluation of four heterogeneous modeling languages and their different impact on user performance and user satisfaction. We deduce implications for both educational and industrial use using the Framework for Usability Evaluation of Modeling Languages (FUEML).en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGesellschaft für Informatik e.V.
dc.relation.ispartofModellierung 2012
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLecture Notes in Informatics (LNI) - Proceedings, Volume P-201
dc.titleExploring usability-driven differences of graphical modeling languages: an empirical research reporten
dc.typeText/Conference Paper
dc.pubPlaceBonn
mci.reference.pages91-106
mci.conference.sessiontitleRegular Research Papers
mci.conference.locationBamberg
mci.conference.date14.-16. März 2012


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Zur Kurzanzeige