Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor.authorKopp, Oliver
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorWutke, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorLeymann, Frank
dc.contributor.editorLoos, Peter
dc.contributor.editorNüttgens, Markus
dc.contributor.editorTurowski, Klaus
dc.contributor.editorWerth, Dirk
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-04T12:12:45Z
dc.date.available2019-06-04T12:12:45Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-88579-235-2
dc.identifier.issn1617-5468
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/23618
dc.description.abstractThe most prominent business process notations in use today are BPMN, EPC and BPEL. While all those languages show similarities on the conceptual level and share similar constructs, the semantics of these constructs and even the intended use of the language itself are often quite different. As a result, users are uncertain when to use which language or construct in a particular language, especially when they have used another business process notation before. In this paper, we discuss the core characteristics of graph-based and block-structured modeling languages and compare them with respect to their join and loop semantics.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGesellschaft für Informatik e.V.
dc.relation.ispartofModellierung betrieblicher Informationssysteme (MobIS 2008)
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLecture Notes in Informatics (LNI) - Proceedings, Volume P-141
dc.titleOn the choice between graph-based and block-structured business process modeling languagesen
dc.typeText/Conference Paper
dc.pubPlaceBonn
mci.reference.pages59-72
mci.conference.sessiontitleRegular Research Papers
mci.conference.locationSaarbrücken
mci.conference.date27.-28. November 2008


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Zur Kurzanzeige