Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor.authorSarshar, Kamyar
dc.contributor.authorLoos, Peter
dc.contributor.editorMayr, Heinrich C.
dc.contributor.editorBreu, Ruth
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-12T13:25:14Z
dc.date.available2019-08-12T13:25:14Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.isbn3-88579-175-7
dc.identifier.issn1617-5468
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/24240
dc.description.abstractA number of process modelling notations use connectors for the representation of the control-flow while others apply the token game. There are number of good arguments in favour as well as against each to these two ways of representing the control-flow. This contribution describes the results of an empirical comparison of these two approaches from the end-used perspective. The overall outcome of the experiment supports the assumption that notations applying connectors are superior to the token game-based notations in terms of end-user comprehension at the conceptual modelling level.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGesellschaft für Informatik e.V.
dc.relation.ispartofModellierung 2006
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLecture Notes in Informatics (LNI) - Proceedings, Volume P-82
dc.titleControl-flow representation of business processes – an empirical comparison of connectors vs. token gameen
dc.typeText/Conference Paper
dc.pubPlaceBonn
mci.reference.pages297-300
mci.conference.sessiontitleRegular Research Papers
mci.conference.locationInnsbruck, Austria
mci.conference.date22.-24. März 2006


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Zur Kurzanzeige