Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor.authorSchrepp, Martin
dc.contributor.editorHansen, Christian
dc.contributor.editorNürnberger, Andreas
dc.contributor.editorPreim, Bernhard
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-18T15:19:56Z
dc.date.available2020-08-18T15:19:56Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/33539
dc.description.abstractTo choose the best fitting UX questionnaire for a concrete evaluation project is far from being easy. There is a huge number of different UX questionnaires available. Each of them measures by its scales and items a subset of what we understand by the ill-defined concept of user experience. We analyze a sample of 40 established UX questionnaires and try to work out their differences and similarities. This analysis shows the heterogeneity of the field. In addition, we analyze how the current practice to develop new UX questionnaires adds to this inhomogeneity and lack of common understanding what we measure when we measure UX. Hopefully, this is a first step towards the development of a common framework that helps UX professionals to find their way through the jungle of available UX questionnaires and measurement concepts.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGesellschaft für Informatik e.V.
dc.relation.ispartofMensch und Computer 2020 - Workshopband
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMensch und Computer
dc.subjectUser Experience
dc.subjectQuestionnaires
dc.subjectUsability
dc.subjectMeasurement
dc.titleA Comparison of UX Questionnaires - What is their underlying concept of user experience?en
dc.typeText/Conference Poster
dc.pubPlaceBonn
mci.document.qualitydigidoc
mci.conference.sessiontitleMCI-WS11: Quantitative Methoden zur Messung von User Experience
mci.conference.locationMagdeburg
mci.conference.date6.-9. September 2020
dc.identifier.doi10.18420/muc2020-ws105-236


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Zur Kurzanzeige