| dc.contributor.author | Hamburger, Kai | |
| dc.date | 2020-12-01 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-23T09:36:45Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-04-23T09:36:45Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1610-1987 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13218-020-00668-5 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/36325 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Are landmarks exaggerated in human wayfinding? Daniel R. Montello says yes, and I basically agree with his opinion. However, I do agree on a different level. My aim for this discussion article is to point out why landmarks are indeed exaggerated in this research context and I will try to approach this claim from several perspectives. First, the research focus in this field is, unfortunately, mainly on visual landmarks. Second, other modalities than vision—e.g., auditory and/or olfactory senses—can be used for landmark-based wayfinding. Third, we need to clearly differentiate between conscious/effortful and unconscious/automatic processing of spatial information in the context of landmark-based wayfinding. Finally, I will suggest that landmarks, even if exaggerated in the visual domain, are (still) of significant importance in human wayfinding and spatial cognition. | de |
| dc.publisher | Springer | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | KI - Künstliche Intelligenz: Vol. 34, No. 4 | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | KI - Künstliche Intelligenz | |
| dc.subject | Auditory | |
| dc.subject | Landmarks | |
| dc.subject | Modality | |
| dc.subject | Multimodal integration | |
| dc.subject | Olfactory | |
| dc.subject | Spatial cognition | |
| dc.subject | System 1 and system 2 thinking | |
| dc.subject | Visual | |
| dc.subject | Wayfinding | |
| dc.title | Visual Landmarks are Exaggerated: A Theoretical and Empirical View on the Meaning of Landmarks in Human Wayfinding | de |
| dc.type | Text/Journal Article | |
| mci.reference.pages | 557-562 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s13218-020-00668-5 | |