Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor.authorBreig, Jan
dc.contributor.authorWesthoff, Dirk
dc.contributor.editorChristian Wressnegger, Delphine Reinhardt
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-24T11:17:49Z
dc.date.available2023-01-24T11:17:49Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-88579-717-3
dc.identifier.issn1617-5468
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/40133
dc.description.abstractWe aim to debate and eventually be able to carefully judge how realistic the following statement of a young computer scientist is: “I would like to become an ethical correctly acting offensive cybersecurity expert”. The objective of this article is not to judge what is good and what is wrong behavior nor to present an overall solution to ethical dilemmas. Instead, the goal is to become aware of the various personal moral dilemmas a security expert may face during his work life. For this, a total of 14 cybersecurity students from HS Offenburg were asked to evaluate several case studies according to different ethical frameworks. The results and particularities are discussed, considering different ethical frameworks. We emphasize, that different ethical frameworks can lead to different preferred actions and that the moral understanding of the frameworks may differ even from student to student.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn
dc.relation.ispartofGI SICHERHEIT 2022
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLecture Notes in Informatics (LNI) - Proceedings, Volume P-323
dc.subjectCybersecurity
dc.subjectethical frameworks
dc.subjectoffensive security techniques
dc.titleShort Paper: Debating Ethics with Cybersecurity Studentsen
mci.reference.pages183-192
mci.conference.sessiontitleShort Papers
mci.conference.locationKarlsruhe
mci.conference.date5.-8. April 2022
dc.identifier.doi10.18420/sicherheit2022_12
dc.title.subtitleDebating Ethics with Cybersecurity Studentsen


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Zur Kurzanzeige