Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor.authorQuante, Jochen
dc.contributor.authorSaid, Wasim
dc.contributor.editorKelter, Udo
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-27T13:44:19Z
dc.date.available2023-02-27T13:44:19Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0720-8928
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/40448
dc.description.abstractState diagrams are commonly used for specification or illustration of behavior. They appear on all levels, from high-level system behavior down to behavior of a single function. However, state diagrams are often implemented manually, and there is no guarantee that the implementation corresponds to the specification. Furthermore, a state machine may be implemented in the code without having a specification in form of a state diagram, and it might be that the developer was not even aware that he is implementing one. We call this kind of implementations implicit state machines. Our practical experience has shown that such code is very hard to comprehend. In this paper, we describe our work on applying the idea of reflexion models on state diagrams.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGesellschaft für Informatik e.V.
dc.relation.ispartofSoftwaretechnik-Trends Band 39, Heft 2
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSoftwaretechnik-Trends
dc.subjectstate diagram
dc.subjectreflexion model
dc.titleReflexion Models for State Diagramsen
dc.typeText/Conference Paper
dc.pubPlaceBonn
mci.reference.pages45-46
mci.conference.sessiontitle21. Workshop Software-Reengineering und -Evolution (WSRE) und 10. Workshop Design for Future (DFF)
mci.conference.locationBad Honnef
mci.conference.date06.-08. Mai 2019


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Zur Kurzanzeige