Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor.authorWalter, Jürgen
dc.contributor.authorEismann, Simon
dc.contributor.authorHildebrandt, Adrian
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-13T10:09:54Z
dc.date.available2023-03-13T10:09:54Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn0720-8928
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/40773
dc.description.abstractModel-based performance predictions and reconfigurations enable optimizing resource efficiency while ensuring that Quality-of-Service demands are met in today’s complex ITsystems. The Descartes Modeling Language (DML) and the Palladio Component Model (PCM) are two architectural performance modeling formalisms applied in this context. This paper compares DML to PCM concerning similarities, differences and semantic gaps. Based on this, we propose a mapping from DML to PCM for which we implemented a tool realizing an automated transformation.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGeselllschaft für Informatik e.V.
dc.relation.ispartofSoftwaretechnik-Trends Band 35, Heft 3
dc.subjectComputer Systems Organization; Performance of Systems; Modeling techniques; Software Engineering
dc.titleAutomated Transformation of Descartes Modeling Language to Palladio Component Modelen
dc.typeJournal Articles
dc.pubPlaceBonn
mci.conference.sessiontitleSonderteil: Proceedings of the Symposium on Software Performance (SSP) 2015, 4. - 6. November 2015, Munich, Germany


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Zur Kurzanzeige