Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor.authorKirchgasser,Simon
dc.contributor.authorUhl,Andreas
dc.contributor.editorBrömme,Arslan
dc.contributor.editorBusch,Christoph
dc.contributor.editorDantcheva,Antitza
dc.contributor.editorRathgeb,Christian
dc.contributor.editorUhl,Andreas
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-26T09:21:03Z
dc.date.available2017-09-26T09:21:03Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-88579-664-0
dc.identifier.issn1617-5468
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/4666
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the impact of “ghost” fingerprint and minutiae information in 4 year time-span separated fingerprint datasets. A high amount of ghost fingerprints within the data, eventually a source for differences in acquisition conditions, might be responsible for recently reported template ageing effects. According to that, various experiments have been performed to get rid of this problematic image content and to compare the corresponding matching results to the performance figures using the non altered imprints. The analysis with respect to detected increased error rates exhibits very similar effects for all considered methods no matter if ghost fingerprint information is removed or not. Thus, ghost fingerprints are not responsible for the observed effects.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn
dc.relation.ispartofBIOSIG 2017
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLecture Notes in Informatics (LNI) - Proceedings, Volume P-70
dc.subjectFingerprint Recognition
dc.subjectTemplate Ageing
dc.subjectQuality
dc.subjectGhost Fingerprints
dc.titleFingerprint Template Ageing vs. Template Changes Revisiteden
mci.reference.pages83-94
mci.conference.sessiontitleRegular Research Papers
mci.conference.locationDarmstadt, Germany
mci.conference.date20.-22. September 2017


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Zur Kurzanzeige