| dc.contributor.author | Riehle, Dennis M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jannaber, Sven | |
| dc.contributor.author | Karhof, Arne | |
| dc.contributor.author | Thomas, Oliver | |
| dc.contributor.author | Delfmann, Patrick | |
| dc.contributor.author | Becker, Jörg | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Oberweis, Andreas | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Reussner, Ralf | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-06-21T07:40:53Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-06-21T07:40:53Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-3-88579-648-0 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1617-5468 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The Business Process Modelling Notation (BPMN) and the Event-driven Process Chain (EPC) are both frequently used modelling languages to create business process models. While there is a well-defined standard for BPMN, such a standard is missing for EPC. As a standard would be beneficial to improve interoperability among different vendors, this paper aims at providing the means for future EPC standardization. Therefore, we have conducted a structured literature review of the most common EPC variants in IS research. We provide a structured overview of the evolution of different EPC variants, describe means and capabilities and elaborate different criteria for decision-making in regard to including EPC variants in a standardization process. | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Modellierung 2016 | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI) - Proceedings, Volume P-254 | |
| dc.title | On the de-facto standard of event-driven process chains: how EPC is defined in literature | en |
| dc.type | Text/Conference Paper | |
| dc.pubPlace | Bonn | |
| mci.reference.pages | 61-76 | |
| mci.conference.location | Karlsruhe | |
| mci.conference.date | 2.-4. März 2016 | |